Introducing the Survey 160 Tracking Poll

By Kevin Collins and Stephanie Pedron

Today we are releasing the first set of results from a pilot of a new project of Survey 160: a recurring tracking poll. These polls will track presidential approval and generic house ballot, among other topics to be discussed in upcoming releases. These surveys will also serve as a test-bench for our ongoing methodological research program. 

In a mixed mode live text, text-to-web, and online panel survey to registered voters nationwide, fielded in late August (see full methodological details at the bottom of this blog post), we find that Donald Trump’s approval is 11 points underwater, with just 43% of respondents approving and 54% of respondents disapproving. That estimate is similar to, if slightly more negative than, the polling average produced by the New York Times (43% approve, 52% disapprove) and approximately the same as the average produced by G. Elliot Morris’s Strength in Numbers (42.3 approve to 53.1% disapprove) at the end of the field period.

Beyond these toplines, there is a notable preference intensity gap. We find that 47% of respondents disapprove strongly while just 7% disapprove somewhat, while 29% approve strongly and 14% approve somewhat. Similarly, while we see that 92% of Democrats disapprove of Trump’s performance, and 92% of Republicans approve of his performance, just 68% of Republicans approve strongly compared to 83% of Democrats who disapprove strongly. Among independents, 66% disapprove while 30% approve. Full question wording and crosstabs are available here.

We find that Democrats have a 7 point lead in the generic ballot for US House, with 46% of voters favoring Democratic candidates, 39% favoring Republicans, and 15% unsure. This is a somewhat larger gap than the 3 point lead in the Strength in Numbers average at the end of the field period.

Better Inferences with Experiments

We believe that survey experiments – while common in private message testing – are under utilized in public polling, and to that end we intend to conduct experiments regularly as part of this new initiative. For our first poll, we focused on a topic near to our hearts: the reliability of data collected by the federal statistical system. 

Specifically, we were interested in how news about the firing of the Commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics affected the public’s trust in federal data. We asked people “In general, how trustworthy do you think economic statistics and other data coming from the Federal Government will be over the next year?” This question was either preceded or followed by this question:


“President Donald Trump recently fired the Commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics after recent employment survey estimates from the Bureau showed fewer jobs than anticipated and estimates for previous months were revised downward.

Thinking of this firing specifically, do you approve or disapprove of Donald Trump’s actions?”


How did prompting people with information about this firing action affect trustworthiness? We can compare responses of people who were given this BLS question after the story (the control) to those given this question just before they were asked about trustworthiness (the treatment). Here’s what we see: 

To test for significance we dichotomized this scale to “Untrustworthy”, treating “Not at all” and “Not Very” trustworthy as a single column. Regression analysis shows that the group asked about this question after reading the BLS story is about 5 percentage points more likely to give an “untrustworthy” answer, although this difference is not statistically significant. Notably, though, this treatment effect is concentrated among people who do not identify with either party. Among the independents and other party identifiers, asking about the BLS firing story first increased their probability of rating federal data as either not very trustworthy or not at all trustworthy by 18 percentage points (statistically significant at p<0.05).

Interestingly we see also some heterogeneity in treatment effect by mode, with text modes showing greater effect on perceived untrustworthiness (~7 percentage points, marginally statistically significant at p<0.1), but among the panel sample the treatment was associated with a ~ 1 pp negative effect, albeit one that is not statistically significant. Online panelists are the most common source for respondents for message testing survey experiments in the political analytics industry, so even such a tentative finding of mode effects with effects in opposite directions is a cause for concern. 

We will be continuing to investigate heterogeneity in survey experiment treatment effects by sample source in future work, and encourage others to do so as well. Similarly, if there are questions you are interested in answering with survey experiments, please reach out at info@survey160.com.

Crosstabs

Topline
Party ID
Race
Gender
Education
Age Group
Region
2024 Vote Choice
Overall Democrat Republican Independent Other Party Refused White Black Hispanic AAPI Other Race Man Woman Some other way College Non-college 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Northeast Midwest South West Harris Trump Other Didn't Vote
Do you think things in The United States are generally going in the right direction or the wrong direction? (Note: Respondents saw only one direction question)
Right direction 20 3 42 15 13 1 23 14 12 8 16 24 16 11 19 20 13 11 26 23 18 17 25 15 2 41 7 17
Wrong direction 28 45 8 34 39 30 27 33 28 26 32 24 32 31 30 27 35 33 25 25 27 32 26 29 48 8 38 29
Not sure 6 4 3 5 1 40 4 8 12 6 5 4 7 10 3 7 7 9 3 4 3 5 8 4 3 4 2 8
Do you think things in your community are generally going in the right direction or the wrong direction? (Note: Respondents saw only one direction question)
Right direction 17 9 29 11 12 13 18 11 16 18 14 19 14 24 17 16 15 20 15 16 22 18 15 14 10 27 10 15
Wrong direction 20 27 13 23 26 4 19 25 22 17 21 20 20 17 19 20 25 18 21 19 19 18 16 29 28 15 40 18
Not sure 10 12 6 13 10 12 9 8 10 25 13 8 11 7 11 9 4 10 9 13 12 10 10 9 10 6 3 13
Do you approve or disapprove of the way Donald Trump is handling his job as president?
Strongly approve 29 1 68 16 12 15 35 12 20 17 25 34 25 12 25 32 17 18 38 35 30 25 32 27 1 67 3 22
Somewhat approve 14 4 24 14 11 19 14 13 15 19 9 15 13 28 13 15 11 17 14 12 19 15 13 12 2 25 9 15
Somewhat disapprove 7 9 2 10 4 16 4 16 14 20 6 7 7 5 6 8 11 9 5 5 7 10 6 5 7 3 11 10
Strongly disapprove 47 83 5 56 72 43 46 56 48 23 55 42 52 46 53 43 58 53 39 46 39 48 46 54 89 4 76 48
Not sure 3 3 1 4 1 6 1 4 3 22 5 2 3 9 3 3 3 3 3 1 5 2 3 2 1 1 2 5
Total approve 43 5 92 30 22 34 50 25 35 36 34 50 38 40 38 47 28 35 53 48 49 40 45 39 3 92 12 37
Total disapprove 54 92 7 66 76 60 49 71 61 42 61 49 58 51 59 51 69 62 44 51 46 58 52 60 95 7 86 58
If the 2026 election for US Congress were held today, would you support the Democratic candidate or the Republican candidate on the ballot?
Democratic Candidate 46 93 1 50 49 37 43 64 42 53 45 43 49 57 51 42 52 52 39 46 40 48 43 54 89 2 48 48
Republican Candidate 39 3 93 20 24 5 46 19 33 28 29 46 34 17 36 41 28 30 49 42 44 37 40 36 3 90 26 28
Not sure 15 4 6 30 28 58 11 16 25 18 26 12 17 25 12 16 20 19 12 12 16 15 17 10 8 9 26 25
President Donald Trump recently fired the Commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics after recent employment survey estimates from the Bureau showed fewer jobs than anticipated and estimates for previous months were revised downward. Thinking of this firing specifically, do you approve or disapprove of Donald Trump’s actions?
Strongly approve 21 2 50 12 8 1 25 14 14 9 20 26 18 10 18 23 16 11 29 24 19 20 25 18 2 52 1 13
Somewhat approve 14 3 25 14 4 10 15 14 12 15 5 16 11 7 12 15 5 14 16 14 19 12 13 12 2 23 2 15
Somewhat disapprove 10 14 9 10 5 8 8 12 20 26 7 8 12 6 10 11 13 14 10 6 8 11 10 11 9 8 17 13
Strongly disapprove 46 77 5 56 70 49 45 52 41 29 54 44 47 63 53 41 55 50 38 46 41 48 44 50 85 6 74 46
Don't know 9 4 11 8 12 31 8 7 14 22 13 6 12 15 8 10 11 10 8 9 12 8 8 9 2 12 6 12
In general, how trustworthy do you think economic statistics and other data coming from the Federal Government will be over the next year?
Very trustworthy 12 4 25 9 3 3 14 12 12 1 7 15 10 8 11 13 7 8 14 16 11 9 13 15 4 26 NA 8
Somewhat trustworthy 27 13 49 19 16 8 29 20 18 44 25 31 23 19 28 26 22 26 30 26 34 28 26 22 9 46 39 25
Not very trustworthy 20 26 13 20 29 14 18 24 20 38 22 19 20 33 18 21 27 22 19 16 19 23 20 18 27 12 16 20
Not at all trustworthy 31 47 6 42 39 40 30 36 31 13 31 28 33 27 37 27 34 33 28 30 23 32 31 35 51 6 39 34
Don't know 10 10 7 9 13 36 9 8 19 4 15 6 14 13 6 13 10 12 8 11 13 8 10 10 8 10 6 12
What is your gender?
Man 46 38 51 52 53 15 45 56 46 16 48 100 NA NA 50 43 43 50 47 41 51 40 47 46 42 49 36 46
Woman 53 61 48 47 43 84 54 42 54 77 47 NA 100 NA 49 56 55 48 52 58 48 60 52 54 56 51 60 53
Non-binary 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 6 0 NA NA 30 0 0 1 1 NA NA 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0
Prefer to self-describe 0 NA 0 NA 0 NA 0 NA NA NA NA NA NA 3 NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA NA NA NA 0
Prefer not to say 1 1 0 1 3 0 0 1 0 0 4 NA NA 68 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 3 1
Which of the following best describes your race and ethnic background?
African-American or Black 12 20 5 12 14 5 NA 100 NA NA NA 14 9 16 8 14 17 10 12 10 10 9 16 10 14 4 6 16
Asian-American, South-Asian, or Pacific Islander 3 4 2 3 0 0 NA NA NA 100 NA 1 4 16 4 2 2 5 2 1 2 1 3 4 2 0 NA 4
Hispanic or Latino 14 15 11 10 7 58 NA NA 100 NA NA 14 14 3 8 18 16 25 9 8 13 10 12 22 10 10 9 20
Native American 1 1 1 1 0 0 NA NA NA NA 17 1 1 4 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 NA 2
White or Caucasian 66 56 80 66 60 30 100 NA NA NA NA 64 67 38 72 61 56 55 70 76 68 76 64 56 67 80 70 53
More than one of the above 4 4 1 4 15 5 NA NA NA NA 61 4 4 16 5 3 6 4 4 3 4 2 4 5 5 3 6 4
Other 1 0 1 3 4 2 NA NA NA NA 22 2 1 7 2 1 1 0 2 2 1 1 1 2 1 2 9 1
What is the last year of education or degree you’ve finished?
1st through 11th grade 1 1 1 2 0 NA 1 0 2 NA 2 1 1 NA NA 2 2 2 1 1 0 0 1 3 0 2 NA 2
High School degree or GED 19 18 21 19 5 16 17 26 26 20 6 18 19 6 NA 30 42 19 13 16 27 25 11 18 14 15 11 25
Technical or vocational school 7 2 9 6 6 22 6 8 7 2 6 5 8 5 NA 11 6 2 7 10 3 4 10 6 2 12 1 6
Some college but no degree 21 20 21 19 32 26 20 27 25 13 25 22 21 34 NA 35 18 22 21 23 15 18 24 26 19 21 30 23
Associate’s (2 year) degree 14 15 13 12 12 26 13 14 19 4 10 12 15 4 NA 22 7 15 14 16 12 17 12 15 15 12 8 14
Bachelor’s (4 year) degree 21 24 20 21 30 8 23 11 18 32 28 22 21 22 55 NA 20 26 24 14 19 20 24 20 27 24 41 15
Graduate or professional degree 17 19 15 22 15 3 20 14 4 29 22 20 14 29 45 NA 5 15 21 20 24 16 18 12 23 14 9 16
In the 2024 election for US President, for whom did you vote?
Kamala Harris 42 85 3 46 57 15 43 55 33 32 40 39 44 57 53 36 49 44 37 44 38 40 41 49 100 NA NA 33
Donald Trump 41 3 90 29 20 14 48 23 28 20 33 47 36 16 37 43 28 31 51 44 47 39 42 36 NA 100 NA 27
Chase Oliver 0 0 0 1 1 NA 1 NA NA NA 0 1 0 2 1 0 NA 1 1 0 0 2 0 NA NA NA 36 0
Jill Stein 0 NA NA 1 0 NA 0 NA 1 NA NA 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 NA 0 NA 1 NA NA 4 1
Some other candidate 1 1 0 1 3 NA 1 1 1 NA 2 0 1 2 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 NA NA 61 0
Did not vote for President 13 9 5 20 16 71 6 18 33 42 21 10 16 18 7 17 11 23 10 10 12 16 14 10 NA NA NA 34
Was not eligible to vote for President 2 2 2 2 2 NA 1 3 3 7 4 2 2 3 1 3 10 1 1 0 1 2 2 2 NA NA NA 5
And today, when it comes to politics, do you think of yourself as more of a...
Democrat 31 100 NA NA NA NA 26 52 34 45 28 26 35 36 34 29 38 35 27 28 30 30 31 33 62 1 31 31
Independent 24 NA NA 100 NA NA 24 25 17 30 33 27 21 24 26 22 28 20 22 28 23 21 24 28 25 17 35 28
Republican 35 NA 100 NA NA NA 42 14 26 24 17 39 32 15 31 37 20 28 43 37 36 36 36 30 3 78 19 26
Something else 6 NA NA NA 100 NA 5 7 3 0 17 6 5 23 6 5 10 9 4 2 7 6 5 6 8 3 15 5
Unsure 5 NA NA NA NA 100 2 2 20 0 5 2 7 2 1 7 3 8 3 5 4 6 4 4 2 2 NA 9
Would you call yourself a strong Democrat or a not very strong Democrat?
Not very strong Democrat 8 27 NA NA NA NA 6 14 11 15 9 8 8 16 10 7 13 12 5 7 8 13 8 6 14 0 4 10
Strong Democrat 23 73 NA NA NA NA 20 39 23 30 19 18 27 20 24 22 26 23 22 21 22 18 23 27 48 1 27 20
Would you call yourself a strong Republican or a not very strong Republican?
Not very strong Republican 9 NA 25 NA NA NA 8 8 14 10 4 11 7 5 8 9 9 12 9 5 10 8 8 10 2 17 12 8
Strong Republican 26 NA 75 NA NA NA 34 6 12 14 13 28 25 10 23 28 11 16 34 32 26 28 28 20 1 61 6 18
Do you generally think of yourself as closer to...
Neither 9 NA NA 38 NA NA 6 19 8 18 17 12 7 11 8 9 10 9 7 10 8 7 9 12 6 4 27 14
The Democratic Party 9 NA NA 37 NA NA 11 4 4 3 8 8 9 7 11 7 16 7 7 9 6 9 9 9 18 1 3 8
The Republican Party 5 NA NA 22 NA NA 6 2 3 2 8 7 4 7 6 5 2 3 7 7 8 4 4 6 1 11 3 4
Unsure 1 NA NA 4 NA NA 1 NA 2 7 0 1 1 NA 1 1 NA 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 2 2
How often do you pay attention to what's going on in government and politics? All the time, most of the time, about half the time, once in a while, or never
All the time 37 39 39 36 49 7 42 25 26 22 40 42 32 50 45 32 32 29 40 44 34 40 40 32 46 38 28 30
Most of the time 38 37 40 40 32 32 39 36 42 27 35 39 38 28 42 36 45 45 33 35 39 37 37 42 38 44 50 34
About half the time 14 14 14 15 11 21 13 25 15 18 10 12 16 20 9 18 17 15 19 7 15 14 12 18 10 12 18 19
Once in a while 7 5 7 8 7 20 5 14 8 6 12 5 9 1 3 9 5 7 6 9 10 6 7 5 4 5 NA 11
Never 3 5 1 2 0 20 1 NA 10 27 3 1 5 NA 1 4 1 4 2 4 1 4 4 3 1 1 4 6
In the past 12 months, how often did you discuss political, societal, or local issues with friends or family?
Basically every day 28 32 30 20 42 10 32 24 17 10 22 27 29 26 34 24 24 19 34 32 23 28 31 27 34 27 20 24
A few times a week 36 35 34 44 33 11 37 27 35 29 42 40 31 48 40 33 36 44 34 29 34 34 33 42 41 37 52 29
A few times a month 18 18 18 18 13 24 18 20 19 25 21 18 19 10 16 20 25 19 16 18 24 17 20 13 15 18 19 21
Once a month 4 2 5 4 0 4 3 6 3 6 2 4 2 10 4 3 6 3 4 3 4 3 4 3 3 3 NA 4
Less than once a month 7 6 7 8 6 13 5 16 10 4 2 7 8 4 4 10 6 10 4 9 10 10 4 8 4 8 5 9
Not at all 7 6 6 6 6 37 5 7 16 27 10 3 11 1 2 10 3 6 9 9 6 8 8 6 3 6 4 12
During the past 12 months, have you posted a message or comment online about a political issue or campaign, or have you not done this in the past 12 months?
Have posted a message online about a political issue in past 12 months 38 44 35 37 40 15 41 31 33 13 39 39 36 48 41 36 52 32 39 35 35 35 42 35 47 36 37 31
Have not done this in the past 12 months 56 50 59 58 53 65 54 65 54 70 55 56 56 40 56 56 46 61 53 60 62 57 51 59 48 59 53 60
Not sure 6 6 6 5 7 20 5 5 12 17 6 5 8 13 4 8 2 8 8 6 3 8 8 6 4 5 10 9
How important is politics to your personal identity?
Extremely important 14 19 16 6 22 5 14 19 14 10 14 13 16 18 16 14 22 10 18 12 9 17 17 13 17 14 13 13
Very important 23 31 22 18 25 9 25 14 23 14 19 21 25 32 26 21 20 25 18 29 21 27 24 20 28 21 28 20
Somewhat important 29 28 30 34 24 13 32 31 21 16 19 31 27 24 29 29 30 30 27 29 36 26 24 34 33 31 7 25
Not too important 18 12 19 24 11 27 16 16 23 29 25 20 17 4 16 19 18 19 20 14 18 17 18 19 11 19 22 22
Not at all important 14 9 13 17 18 41 12 19 17 18 21 15 13 17 11 16 10 14 16 15 16 11 15 14 10 14 30 18
Not sure 1 2 0 2 2 5 1 0 2 14 2 1 2 5 2 1 NA 3 1 1 0 1 2 1 1 0 NA 3
Age from voter file.
18-29 12 15 7 14 21 8 10 17 14 7 18 11 12 22 8 14 12 NA NA NA 14 10 12 11 13 8 2 15
30-44 27 31 22 23 44 44 23 24 49 51 23 30 25 43 29 26 NA 27 NA NA 25 32 22 35 30 19 27 32
45-64 33 29 41 31 25 20 35 35 21 29 35 34 32 26 38 29 NA NA 33 NA 36 29 39 24 27 37 53 33
65+ 28 25 30 32 10 29 32 24 16 13 24 25 31 10 25 30 NA NA NA 28 25 29 28 29 30 36 18 20
Region from voter file.
Northeast 18 17 18 17 21 17 19 15 17 13 20 20 16 20 20 17 21 16 20 16 18 NA NA NA 18 21 15 16
Midwest 22 22 23 20 23 29 25 18 16 8 16 19 25 18 21 23 20 26 19 23 NA 22 NA NA 19 20 36 26
South 38 38 39 38 35 37 37 50 33 41 36 39 37 46 41 36 38 30 45 38 NA NA 38 NA 36 39 22 40
West 22 23 19 26 22 17 19 18 34 37 29 22 22 15 18 24 21 28 16 23 NA NA NA 22 27 20 27 19

Methodological Statement

Sampling 

We sampled potential respondents from the L2 voter file of registered voters. The population was divided into 67 non-overlapping strata based on race, age, participation in the 2024 general and primary elections, partisan support model score, and educational attainment model category. This stratification schema was used to define a target number of completes for each stratum, sampled inversely proportional to expected response rates based on past surveys, oversampling to allow for variation from these expected response rates. After defining stratification and targets, we then limited the sample to records with cell-phones.

We supplemented this text-to-web survey with a sample of Cint panelists who had been matched to the voter file, to mitigate concerns over coverage of a cell-only sample and other mode-specific non-response biases. We then reconstructed which sampling strata these Cint panelists belonged to based on voter file data. 

Fielding

The text-to-web and live interviewer surveys were fielded from Tuesday August 26 through Monday September 1, 2025. The first day of fielding was a “soft launch” limiting the number of records. We then activated the DRASS sampling system to adjust for relative non-response across sampling strata. We also set quotas matching target numbers for the completed responses by strata, such that we did not initiate any new surveys to respondents from strata where the quotas had been met, but did not terminate respondents after their respective stratum-level quota had been met either. We re-contacted people who had not responded to the initial outreach, limiting this recontact to strata where the quota had not been met, then left the survey open on a final day of fielding without any additional contacts.

Some text-to-web respondents were told of a $100 Amazon gift card conditional lottery incentive after initially agreeing to participate in the survey, though all respondents were offered this incentive after completing the survey. We checked to make sure there were no duplicate records in the text sample, and discarded 19 records with duplicate voter records. Post-deduplication, we had a total of 536 completed interviews via text-to-web and 508 completed interviews via live interviewer surveys. 

The panel-to-web surveys were from a list of registered voter targets from Cint, who has matched their panelists to the L2 voter file, limiting the respondents to those who were affirmatively matched. These panelists were then interviewed from Tuesday August 26 through Saturday August 30, with quotas in place matching the sample stratification targets. These responses were then matched back to the L2 file, appending the demographic necessary to reconstruct their sampling strata. We completed 393 interviews via panel-to-web fielding, for a combined mixed-mode sample of 1,437 interviews. 

Weighting

Pooling the text-to-web and live interviewer SMS surveys, we first created base weights by rake weighting these samples back to stratification benchmarks using fields associated with the respondents in the voter file. We then use these weights to estimate the frequency of survey taking, creating bins. 

Then we rake weight the panel-to-web responses using both the distribution of strata and this binned estimate of survey response frequency to create base weights for the panel-to-web survey. 

Finally, with these base weights as starting values, we pool the data together and rake the combined sample to the strata distribution, survey response frequency, census region, joint distribution of race and educational attainment,  gender using self-reports, party affiliation using self-reports, and 2024 turnout and vote choice, using voter-file data to correct over-reports of turnout. Weighting targets for race and educational attainment, gender, party affiliation, 2024 turnout and vote choice, and census region are derived from the Pew NPORS survey conducted January 2025. Weights were trimmed at 0.1 and 10.

After accounting for the Kish 1+L approximation of the design effect from weighting, the margin of error is 5.8 percentage points. 

Other Disclosures

This survey of registered voters in the United States was paid for by Survey 160 as part of our ongoing methodological research initiatives. All estimates of public opinion have sources of error beyond that which is captured by the margin of error, including non-ignorable (post weighting) non-response error, frame and coverage error, measurement error and processing error. 

Survey Instrument

Q1 Right/Wrong Direction

First, do you think things in the [Randomize: The United States/your community] are generally going in the right direction or the wrong direction? [Rotate 1-2]

  1. Right direction

  2. Wrong direction

  3. Not sure

  4. Refused [VOL]

Q2: Attention Barometer

In a few words, what news story caught your attention this week? 

“News” can be anything you follow, whether local TV, websites, podcasts, or social media, on any topic like sports, entertainment, or politics. We just want to know what caught your attention.

If you can’t think of anything specific, that’s okay, just say so. Please reply in your own words.

Q3 Presidential Job Approval (Donald Trump)

Do you approve or disapprove of the way Donald Trump is handling his job as president?
[Flip Order 1234 / 4321]

  1. Strongly approve

  2. Somewhat approve

  3. Somewhat disapprove

  4. Strongly disapprove

  5. Not sure

Q4 Generic Ballot 

If the 2026 election for US Congress were held today, would you support the [Rotate] Democratic candidate or the Republican candidate on the ballot? [Rotate 1-2]

  1. The Democratic Candidate 

  2. The Republican Candidates

  3. Not sure 

[Randomize order of Q5 and Q6]

Q5: BLS Commissioner   

President Donald Trump recently fired the Commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics after recent employment survey estimates from the Bureau showed fewer jobs than anticipated and estimates for previous months were revised downward.

Thinking of this firing specifically, do you approve or disapprove of Donald Trump’s actions?

[Flip 1234 / 4321, keep same order as overall approval]

  1. Strongly approve

  2. Somewhat approve

  3. Somewhat disapprove

  4. Strongly disapprove

  5. Not sure

  6. Refused [VOL on Live SMS]


Q6: Trust Federal Statistics

In general, how trustworthy do you think economic statistics and other data coming from the Federal Government will be over the next year? 

[Flip 1234 / 4321]

1)  Very trustworthy

2)  Somewhat trustworthy

3)  Not very trustworthy

4)  Not at all trustworthy

5)  Not sure

Q7 Gender
The next set of questions are for statistical purposes only.

What is your gender?

  1. Man

  2. Woman

  3. Non-binary

  4. Prefer to self-describe

  5. Prefer not to say

Q8 YOB
In what year were you born? Please respond with a four-digit year.

Q9 Age Bucket [Live Text only]
I know not everyone is comfortable providing their birth year, but could you tell us in which of the following ranges it falls?

  1. 1997 or later

  2. 1981 - 1996

  3. 1965 - 1980

  4. 1946 - 1964

  5. 1945 or earlier

Q10 Race
Which of the following best describes your race and ethnic background?

  1. African-American or Black

  2. Asian-American, South-Asian, or Pacific Islander

  3. Hispanic or Latino

  4. Native American

  5. White or Caucasian

  6. More than one of the above

  7. Other (please specify)

Q11 Education Level
What is the last year of education or degree you’ve finished?

  1. 1st through 11th grade

  2. High School degree or GED

  3. Technical or vocational school

  4. Some college but no degree

  5. Associate’s (2 year) degree

  6. Bachelor’s (4 year) degree

  7. Graduate or professional degree

Q12 [Embargoed]

Q13 Vote Choice 2024

In the 2024 election for US President, for whom did you vote?

  1. Democrat Kamala Harris

  2. Republican Donald Trump

  3. Libertarian Chase Oliver

  4. Green Party candidate Jill Stein

  5. Some other candidate (please specify)

  6. Did not vote for President

  7. Was not eligible to vote for President 

Q14 Party ID
And today, when it comes to politics, do you think of yourself as more of a …

[Rotate 1-2]

  1. Democrat ⇒ Q15a

  2. Republican ⇒ Q15b

  3. Independent ⇒ Q15c

  4. Something else

  5. Unsure 

Q15a Strength - Democrat
Would you call yourself a strong Democrat  or a not very strong Democrat?

  1. Strong Democrat

  2. Not very strong Democrat 

Q15b Strength - Republican
Would you call yourself a strong Republican  or a not very strong Republican?

  1. Strong Republican

  2. Not very strong Republican 

Q15c Party ID Lean
Do you generally think of yourself as closer to …

  1. The Democratic Party

  2. The Republican Party

  3. Neither

  4. Unsure

Q16 Political Attention

How often do you pay attention to what's going on in government and politics? All the time, most of the time, about half the time, once in a while, or never
1. All the time
2. Most of the time
3. About half the time
4. Once in a while
5. Never

Q17 Political Talk

In the past 12 months, how often did you discuss political, societal, or local issues with friends or family?

1. Basically every day
2. A few times a week
3. A few times a month
4. Once a month
5. Less than once a month
6. Not at all

Q18 Political Posting 

During the past 12 months, have you posted a message or comment online about a political issue or campaign, or have you not done this in the past 12 months?
1. Have posted a message online about a political issue in past 12 months
2. Have not done this in the past 12 months
3. Unsure

Q19 Importance of Politics to Identity
How important is politics to your personal identity?

  1.  Extremely important

  2.  Very important

  3.  Somewhat important

  4.  Not too important

  5.  Not at all important

  6.  Not sure


Q20: Other Polls

Sometimes, people answer multiple polls from different survey organizations. Besides this poll, how many polls have you answered in the last month?  Please reply with a specific number, and if you cannot recall exactly, please just give your best guess.   [Free response, limited to integer in web survey]

Q21: [Embargoed]

Q22: [Embargoed] 

Q23: Income

Finally, last year, that is in 2024, what was your total family income from all sources, before taxes?

  1. Less than $30,000

  2. $30,000 to less than $40,000

  3. $40,000 to less than $50,000

  4. $50,000 to less than $60,000

  5. $60,000 to less than $70,000

  6. $70,000 to less than $80,000

  7. $80,000 to less than $90,000

  8. $90,000 to less than $100,000

  9. $100,000 or more

  10. Prefer not to answer

Next
Next

The Limits of Simulation in Public Opinion Research